Rant 3: Thieving Prince and Maddy Misuse
Edith Garcia, Thief and Son, Contemporary Monsters I, 2007, Clay, 36cm x 20cm x 12cm, Credit: Edith Garcia
Manipulation of the media may be alive and well this week as the outrage that surrounds the current show at Decima gallery in Hackney Wick takes hold in the tabloid press. Is it acceptable to use the face of Madeleine McCann pasted onto pornographic images and call it art? And whilst we are on the subject of manipulation – has Richard Prince significantly transformed the photographs in his recent work to avoid being sued by an aggrieved photographer?
Provocative appropriations of images have caused a hubbub both home and abroad over the past week. Over in New York, nurse painter Richard Prince has had a lawsuit filed against him by photographer Patrick Cariou who claims that his work has been improperly used without permission.
Cariou claims that of the series of paintings, displayed in a recent exhibition entitled Canal Zone at one of the Gagosian galleries in New York, 20 out of 22 have lifted photos of Rastafarians from his bookYes Rasta, published in 2000.
Prince will win the case if a judge rules his use of the images to be transformative – that is, if they have been sufficiently manipulated so as to give them a life of their own. A tough case to call as his intervention seems minimal apart from the metamorphic powers of his signature.
Within our own humble shores, London’s Hackney Wick gallery Decima stirred up its own appropriation furore in its sticking of pictures of Madeleine McCann’s head over porno bodies. Nobody seems to know if the exhibition actually occurred but apparently it was THE PUBLIC who were asked to STICK the images of this INNOCENT child over VILE sex. Decima point out in an online riposte that the Maddy story has exposed our opportunistic tabloid media to bursting point and their exhibition investigates this.
Sure, it’s provocative, in a really obvious and predictable way, and although the tabloids’ shameless pimping of the McCann story is exploitative, combining images of any small child’s head with porno is an easy contradiction – but does it mean anything?
A PR stunt no doubt, although Decima claim that they didn’t realise they had sent out the press release to any media. A stroke of luck then!
The views expressed in The Rant are those of the author and forum contributors and unless specifically stated are not those of Axisweb. See our terms and conditions